Tutor: Okay, so in this section, where you link flipped learning with andragogy, you conclude by adding the learning cycle. And I am not so sure this is relevant for your argument. You clearly explain how flipped learning can fit under andragogy and pedandragogy, but this section on the learning cycle feels a bit rushed. I would suggest that you either remove it all together, or add a little paragraph, making that connection explicit and clear for your reader.
(= the tutor gives feedback on the student’s work and then offers two suggestions for improvement: suggestion 1 or suggestion 2)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Student: Hmm, sorry but I am not quite clear on the point you made about explicitly linking the learning cycle with flipped learning and andragogy. Do you mean explaining how it’s related to both?
(= the student is not entirely sure about what the second suggestion means)
Tutor: Yes, as it stands it feels like a little bit of an ‘add on’ and it is unclear what is the purpose of the flipped learning, sorry… of the learning cycle, and how it helps further support your point with flipped learning being really, really good for adults and you know grown-up students.
Student: Uh-huh, I think I can see what you mean.